An open exploration of viable human-AI systems.
View the Project on GitHub algoplexity/cybernetic-intelligence
Title: Mesoscopic Intelligence as Reflexive Control of Compression-Aligned Substrate Dynamics
CIv10 defines intelligence as the capacity to sense, describe, and repair the structure of its own symbolic and latent representations—in real time, across scales.
The symbolic substrate (emergent motifs from byte-level attention) and the latent substrate (contact-geometric flows) are not merely aligned, but reflexively entangled. A mesoscopic intelligence layer continuously monitors for breakdowns in compressive coherence, diagnoses these as fault surfaces, and triggers targeted adaptation mechanisms—including language-conditioned architectural patches.
CIv10 reframes intelligence as the cybernetic coordination of compression, geometry, and meaning across emergent symbols, latent flows, and introspective feedback loops.
| Layer | Upgrade | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Σ: Symbolic Substrate | AU-Net | Byte → Word → Motif via adaptive pooling; BDM/entropy reveal motif transitions |
| Z: Latent Substrate | GCF | Contact Hamiltonian dynamics; geometric control of latent concept flows |
| M: Mesoscope | CIv10 Core | Observes ∆C (compressibility), ∇T (curvature), σ (uncertainty); defines fault geometry |
| L: Reflex Layer | T2L | Fault descriptions generate LoRA patches; task-directed latent repairs |
Let:
Σ = symbolic substrate via AU-Net (multi-scale attention)Z = latent substrate as a contact manifold (N, η)C(Σ), C(Z) = compressibility functionsT(Z) = torsion / curvature signature of latent flowσ(Z) = uncertainty estimate over latent evolutionF = fault surface = { x |
∆C | > ε ∨ | ∇T | > δ ∨ σ > τ } |
M(Σ, Z) = mesoscope mapping to identify fault geometrydesc(F) = symbolic description of fault regionL(desc(F)) = T2L-generated LoRA patch injected into modelThen:
F = M(Σ, Z) locates compression and topological failuresReflexive adaptation via:
Σ(F) → ∆ΣL(desc(F)) → ∆ZIntelligence is the ongoing self-regulation of representational structure, guided by internal observation of failure across symbolic and latent compressibility regimes.
CIv10 enables:
| Conceptual Domain | Supporting Research |
|---|---|
| Symbolic Emergence | AU-Net (2025) — multiscale pooling replaces tokenization |
| Latent Geometry | GCF (2025) — contact flows enable interpretable control |
| Reflexive Repair | Text-to-LoRA (2025) — instruction → LoRA patching |
| Fault Topology | Walch, Grosse, Zenil — torsion & BDM as cognitive fault markers |
| Bidirectional Feedback | SEAL (2024) — self-edits for symbolic–latent realignment |
| Semantic Alignment | Object Concept Embedding Study (2025) — LLM latent axes match cortical regions |
Enables models to:
CIv10 is not just a brain—it’s a self-aware, self-modifying nervous system. It detects breakdowns, narrates them, and surgically adjusts its structure before coherence fails. This is not just learning. It is cybernetic self-repair.
From CIv8r’s unified reflexivity to CIv10’s operational autonomy, we now define intelligence as: “The reflexive management of meaning through compression-aligned structural coherence.”